Attitudinal Analysis of Work/School Travel
Koppelman and Lyon, 1981, in Transportation Science
doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/25768019
Location |
Evanston, IL |
Population |
nan |
Sample size |
356 |
Factor analysis type |
exploratory factor analysis, unknown rotation |
Stepwise regression |
no |
Removal of insignificant variables |
no |
Reviewed by |
NAH |
Abstract
This report describes the analysis of the choice of travel mode for trips to work or school through the study of attitudinal and behavioral responses. Travel behavior (mode choice) is linked to attitudes about the alternative modes through an intermediate preference construct. Individual attitudes are analyzed to obtain measures of perceptions of and feelings toward available transportation modes. These measures are related to mode preference, and preferences and situational constraints are related to choice. Differences in the perception-feelings-preference-choice formulation between travelers making local work trips and those making suburb-to-CBD work trips are identified and interpreted.
Factors
Models
Dependent variable |
most preferred mode |
Model type |
logit |
Sample size |
356 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
Convenience |
0.79
|
<0.05 |
General Service |
1.1
|
<0.05 |
Psychological Stress |
0.13
|
nan |
Bus Preferance |
0.88
|
<0.05 |
Walk Preferance |
0.61
|
<0.05 |
Car Preferance |
0.23
|
nan |
Walk constant |
0.55
|
nan |
Car constant |
1.0
|
nan |
Dependent variable |
most preferred mode |
Model type |
logit |
Sample size |
356 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
Convenience |
0.7
|
<0.05 |
General Service |
1.08
|
<0.05 |
Psychological Stress |
0.11
|
nan |
Affect |
0.41
|
<0.05 |
Normative Beliefs |
0.58
|
<0.05 |
Walk constant |
0.0
|
nan |
Car constant |
-0.1
|
nan |
Dependent variable |
Preference Index |
Model type |
logit |
Sample size |
356 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
Automobile availability |
0.42
|
nan |
Preference index |
0.61
|
<0.05 |
Bus constant |
1.0
|
nan |
Walk constant |
0.18
|
nan |
Car constant |
0.18
|
nan |
Dependent variable |
Preference Index |
Model type |
logit |
Sample size |
356 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
Automobile availability |
0.37
|
nan |
Preference index |
0.69
|
<0.05 |
Bus constant |
1.0
|
nan |
Walk constant |
-0.09
|
nan |
Car constant |
-0.47
|
nan |
Dependent variable |
First Preference |
Model type |
logit |
Sample size |
356 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
Access convenience |
0.68
|
<0.05 |
Access general service |
0.63
|
<0.05 |
Access psychological stress |
0.06
|
nan |
Line-haul convenience |
0.25
|
nan |
Line-haul comfort |
0.14
|
nan |
Line-haul travel stress |
0.86
|
<0.05 |
Affect |
0.03
|
nan |
Normative Beliefs |
0.53
|
<0.05 |
Auto Line-hual affect |
0.27
|
<0.05 |
Auto Line-hual normative beliefs |
0.74
|
<0.05 |
Bus constent |
1.74
|
<0.05 |
Walk constant |
2.13
|
<0.05 |
EL constant |
-1.82
|
<0.05 |
Train constant |
-1.93
|
<0.05 |