Cycling usage and frequency determinants in college campuses

Kaveh Bakhsh Kelarestaghi, Alireza Ermagun, Kevin P. Heaslip, 2019, in Cities

doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.004
Location Baltimore, US
Population Other (specify)
Sample size 780
Factor analysis type nan, nan rotation
Stepwise regression nan
Removal of insignificant variables nan
Reviewed by DS/MWC

Abstract

This study explores the cycling usage and frequency determinants in college campuses located in the Baltimore Metropolitan Area. The study discerns the attitudes of individuals toward the proposed infrastructure and environmental improvements with the goal of promoting biking to campus. We develop a structural equation model (SEM) using the travel information of 780 individuals, which was collected between December 2014 and June 2015. The results indicate risk factors have a higher explanatory value on bike-to-campus frequency than campus infrastructure and program. We further examine how and to what extent mixed populations on college campuses respond to latent factors. The findings pinpoint that males are less concerned about the risk-related indicators such as theft and road and environment-related obstacles such as poor road conditions. However, females have a positive attitude toward campus-related improvements such as pro-bike programs. Overall, students show a negative attitude toward the road and environmentally-related obstacles compared to staff and faculty. Minority groups, specifically African American and Asian, show a positive attitude toward campus-related improvements, unlike white participants. The findings can assist planners and advocates in implementing effective policy measures to increase bike-to-campus frequency. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Factors

Models

Source variable Target variable Effect p-value Effect type
Risk Bike to campus frequency -0.477 0.0 direct_effect
Road and Environment Bike to campus frequency 1.0 nan direct_effect
Campus Infrastructure and Programs Bike to campus frequency 0.079 0.063 direct_effect
Commute with bicycle Bike to campus frequency 0.306 0.0 direct_effect
Distance to campus ≤5 miles Bike to campus frequency 0.244 0.0 direct_effect
Highest degree: ≥bachelor Bike to campus frequency 0.168 0.0 direct_effect
Interested but concerned cyclist Bike to campus frequency -0.19 0.0 direct_effect
Incident involvement Bike to campus frequency 0.193 0.0 direct_effect
Commute by private vehicle Bike to campus frequency -0.161 0.001 direct_effect
Constant Bike to campus frequency 1.071 0.0 direct_effect
Commute with bicycle Road and Environment 0.027 0.016 direct_effect
Student Road and Environment -0.023 0.055 direct_effect
Strong/fearless and enthused/confident cyclist Road and Environment -0.034 0.003 direct_effect
Male Road and Environment -0.042 0.0 direct_effect
Commute with bicycle Campus Infrastructure and Programs 0.081 0.089 direct_effect
Encourage others to bike Campus Infrastructure and Programs 0.179 0.0 direct_effect
Male Campus Infrastructure and Programs -0.096 0.028 direct_effect
White ethnicity Campus Infrastructure and Programs -0.165 0.001 direct_effect
Male Risk -0.109 0.0 direct_effect
Interested but concerned cyclist Risk 0.161 0.0 direct_effect
Incident involvement Risk 0.087 0.001 direct_effect
Commute by private vehicle Risk 0.073 0.012 direct_effect

The Attitudes and Travel Database is produced with support from the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks at Arizona State University, a University Transportation Center sponsored by the US Department of Transportation through Grant No. 69A3551747116.

sha256:a08d9e369743bf7e6d1c40d27347318209b40a7fb1543813fdcf31b898918815