Examining Shanghai consumer preferences for electric vehicles and their attributes
Nie, Wang, Guo, Shen, 2018, in Sustainability (Switzerland)
doi:10.3390/su10062036
Location |
Shanghai, China |
Population |
Other (specify) |
Sample size |
760 |
Factor analysis type |
exploratory factor analysis, unknown rotation |
Stepwise regression |
no |
Removal of insignificant variables |
no |
Reviewed by |
LCM |
Abstract
In this study, we conducted a stated choice survey in Shanghai in order to examine the attitudes of Shanghai residents towards electric vehicles and their attributes. Multinomial Logit and Random Parameter Logit models were used to analyze the response data for three samples-the full sample, a subsample of potential electric vehicle purchasers, and a subsample of unlikely electric vehicle purchasers. We found that the respondents in each of the three groups preferred electric vehicles with a longer driving range, a shorter charging time, a faster maximum speed, lower pollution emissions, lower fuel cost, and a lower price. However, an overlong driving range seems not to be a must for potential electric vehicles (EV) purchasers. In addition, a comparison of the two subsamples showed that potential electric vehicle purchasers were willing to pay more than their counterparts for enhancing vehicle attributes. We also investigated the determinants of likely electric vehicle purchase and found a number of demographic characteristics that were statistically significant. © 2018 by the authors.
Factors
Models
Dependent variable |
Preference for EV characteristics |
Model type |
MNL |
Sample size |
3040.0 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
-2955.81 |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
EV1 Constant |
0.316
|
0.024 |
EV2 Constant |
0.141
|
0.001 |
Driving range: 200 km |
0.37
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 300 km |
0.633
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 400 km |
0.848
|
0.0 |
Charging time: 3 h |
0.197
|
0.81 |
Charging time: 1 h |
0.283
|
0.0 |
Charging time: 10 min |
0.547
|
0.0 |
Pollution degree |
0.747
|
0.0 |
Maximum speed |
2.611
|
0.0 |
Fuel costs |
-0.982
|
0.001 |
Relative price |
-0.126
|
0.0 |
Dependent variable |
Preference for EV characteristics |
Model type |
MNL |
Sample size |
1656.0 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
-1499.5 |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
EV1 Constant |
-0.318
|
0.478 |
EV2 Constant |
0.209
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 200 km |
0.485
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 300 km |
0.606
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 400 km |
0.822
|
0.0 |
Charging time: 3 h |
0.472
|
0.826 |
Charging time: 1 h |
0.319
|
0.003 |
Charging time: 10 min |
0.595
|
0.0 |
Pollution degree |
0.745
|
0.0 |
Maximum speed |
3.138
|
0.0 |
Fuel costs |
-0.7
|
0.085 |
Relative price |
-0.1
|
0.0 |
Dependent variable |
Preference for EV characteristics |
Model type |
MNL |
Sample size |
1296.0 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
-1282.76 |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
EV1 Constant |
0.832
|
0.0 |
EV2 Constant |
0.503
|
0.459 |
Driving range: 200 km |
0.263
|
0.044 |
Driving range: 300 km |
0.605
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 400 km |
0.865
|
0.0 |
Charging time: 3 h |
0.066
|
0.617 |
Charging time: 1 h |
0.319
|
0.016 |
Charging time: 10 min |
0.56
|
0.0 |
Pollution degree |
0.899
|
0.0 |
Maximum speed |
1.421
|
0.012 |
Fuel costs |
-1.45
|
0.003 |
Relative price |
-0.173
|
0.0 |
Dependent variable |
Preference for EV characteristics |
Model type |
MNL |
Sample size |
3040.0 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
-2945.83 |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
EV1 Constant |
0.172
|
0.441 |
EV2 Constant |
0.174
|
0.004 |
Driving range: 200 km |
0.505
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 300 km |
0.864
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 400 km |
1.123
|
0.0 |
Charging time: 3 h |
0.073
|
0.509 |
Charging time: 1 h |
0.361
|
0.001 |
Charging time: 10 min |
0.697
|
0.0 |
Pollution degree |
0.93
|
0.0 |
Maximum speed |
3.241
|
0.0 |
Fuel costs |
-1.23
|
0.006 |
Relative price |
-0.157
|
0.0 |
Dependent variable |
Preference for EV characteristics |
Model type |
MNL |
Sample size |
1656.0 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
-1483.76 |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
EV1 Constant |
-0.904
|
0.153 |
EV2 Constant |
0.329
|
0.009 |
Driving range: 200 km |
0.863
|
0.001 |
Driving range: 300 km |
1.161
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 400 km |
1.405
|
0.001 |
Charging time: 3 h |
0.186
|
0.327 |
Charging time: 1 h |
0.584
|
0.01 |
Charging time: 10 min |
1.224
|
0.001 |
Pollution degree |
1.316
|
0.001 |
Maximum speed |
5.604
|
0.001 |
Fuel costs |
-1.615
|
0.08 |
Relative price |
-0.714
|
0.0 |
Dependent variable |
Preference for EV characteristics |
Model type |
MNL |
Sample size |
1296.0 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
-1279.15 |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
EV1 Constant |
0.807
|
0.002 |
EV2 Constant |
0.051
|
0.535 |
Driving range: 200 km |
0.304
|
0.049 |
Driving range: 300 km |
0.69
|
0.0 |
Driving range: 400 km |
0.992
|
0.0 |
Charging time: 3 h |
0.023
|
0.897 |
Charging time: 1 h |
0.336
|
0.026 |
Charging time: 10 min |
0.592
|
0.0 |
Pollution degree |
0.928
|
0.0 |
Maximum speed |
1.517
|
0.02 |
Fuel costs |
-1.73
|
0.004 |
Relative price |
-0.193
|
0.0 |
Dependent variable |
Determinants of being a potential EV purchaser |
Model type |
Logit regression |
Sample size |
680.0 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
-5072.3 |
Variable |
Coefficient |
p-value |
Constant term |
-0.046
|
nan |
Male |
0.202
|
<0.01 |
Age |
-0.004
|
nan |
Masters degree or above |
0.479
|
<0.01 |
Individual annual income |
0.092
|
<0.01 |
Mid-level or manager |
-0.351
|
<0.01 |
Salariat |
0.126
|
<0.1 |
Entrepreneur |
-0.05
|
nan |
Civil servant |
-0.079
|
nan |
Professionals (teacher, doctor, lawyer, etc.) |
-0.056
|
nan |
Family with cars |
-0.149
|
<0.01 |
Pay attention to policies related to NEVs |
0.712
|
<0.01 |
Green consumption consciousness |
0.258
|
<0.01 |
Acceptance of new product and new technology |
0.261
|
<0.01 |
Environmental protection awareness |
-0.102
|
<0.01 |