Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model

Daziano, Bolduc, 2013, in Transportmetrica A: Transport Science

doi:10.1080/18128602.2010.524173
Location Canada
Population General
Sample size 1877
Factor analysis type nan, nan rotation
Stepwise regression no
Removal of insignificant variables no
Reviewed by 2020-04-13 00:00:00

Abstract

Using stated data on both vehicle purchase decisions and environmental concerns, we develop, implement and apply the MCMC Gibbs sampler for Bayesian estimation of a Hybrid Choice Model (HCM). Whereas classical estimation of HCMs is fairly complex, we verify the feasibility of the Bayesian estimator as well as the HCM capacity to adapt to practical situations. We show that the Bayesian approach for HCMs is methodologically easier to implement than simulated maximum likelihood because the inclusion of latent variables translates into adding independent ordinary regressions; we also find that, using the Bayesian estimates, forecasting and deriving confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures is straightforward. Our empirical results coincide with a priori expectations, namely that environmentally-conscious consumers are willing to pay more for low-emission vehicles. The model outperforms standard discrete choice models because it not only incorporates pro-environmental preferences but also provides tools to build a profile of environmentally-conscious consumers.

Factors

Models

Dependent variable Type of car purchased
Model type Bayesian ICLV
Sample size 1877.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants nan
Log-likelihood at convergence -1955.34
AFV
Variable Coefficient p-value
Alternative specific constant (AFV) -6.185 0.0
Environmental concern (Bayesian) 0.585 0.0
Environmental concern
Variable Coefficient p-value
Intercept 1.84 0.0
Driving alone user -0.157 0.026
Carpool user 0.236 0.032
Transit user 0.482 0.0
Female indicator 0.344 0.0
High income indicator (> 80K$) 0.046 0.441
University indicator 0.274 0.0
Age level: 26-40 years 0.447 0.0
Age level: 41-55 years 0.544 0.0
Age level: 56 years and up 0.839 0.0
HEV
Variable Coefficient p-value
Alternative specific constant (HEV) -2.53 0.0
Environmental concern (Bayesian) 0.411 0.0
HFC
Variable Coefficient p-value
Alternative specific constant (HFC) -4.049 0.0
Environmental concern (Bayesian) 0.674 0.0
Variable Coefficient p-value
Purchase price -0.895 0.0
Fuel cost -0.852 0.0
Fuel availability 1.388 0.0
Express lane access 0.158 0.024
Power 2.729 0.0
Dependent variable Type of car purchased
Model type ICLV
Sample size 1877.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants nan
Log-likelihood at convergence -1987.52
AFV
Variable Coefficient p-value
Alternative specific constant (AFV) -6.189 0.0
Environmental concern (classical) 0.592 0.0
Environmental concern (classical)
Variable Coefficient p-value
Intercept 2.067 0.0
Driving alone user -0.143 0.063
Carpool user 0.241 0.086
Transit user 0.468 0.0
Female indicator 0.342 0.0
High income indicator (> 80K$) 0.05 0.453
University indicator 0.285 0.0
Age level: 26-40 years 0.439 0.001
Age level: 41-55 years 0.538 0.0
Age level: 56 years and up 0.829 0.0
HEV
Variable Coefficient p-value
Alternative specific constant (HEV) -2.541 0.0
Environmental concern (classical) 0.42 0.0
HFC
Variable Coefficient p-value
Alternative specific constant (HFC) -4.093 0.0
Environmental concern (classical) 0.692 0.0
Variable Coefficient p-value
Purchase price -0.894 0.0
Fuel cost -0.854 0.0
Fuel availability 1.398 0.0
Express lane access 0.16 0.024
Power 2.752 0.0

The Attitudes and Travel Database is produced with support from the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks at Arizona State University, a University Transportation Center sponsored by the US Department of Transportation through Grant No. 69A3551747116.

sha256:a08d9e369743bf7e6d1c40d27347318209b40a7fb1543813fdcf31b898918815