Joint consideration of energy expenditure, air quality, and safety by cyclists

Bigazzi, Gehrke, 2018, in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.005
Location Vancouver, Canada
Population Other (specify)
Sample size 625
Factor analysis type confirmatory factor analysis, unknown rotation
Stepwise regression no
Removal of insignificant variables no
Reviewed by LCM

Abstract

Public health benefits are an important motivator and justification for urban cycling promotion. The health impacts of cycling are typically evaluated using three main effect pathways: physical activity (exercise), air pollution exposure, and safety (crashes). Effects of safety on cycling behaviour have been investigated, but little is known about how energy expenditure and air quality concerns influence cycling decisions. Understanding cyclist perceptions and preferences is important for planning and designing sustainable and healthy transportation networks. As such, research providing insights into the heterogeneity of these concerns is needed to inform models of behavioural change with evolving vehicles, technology, and infrastructure. The objective of this paper is to investigate the joint consideration of energy expenditure, air quality, and safety concerns by cyclists, and their relationships with cycling frequency. A structural equation model is developed based on data from a survey of 625 intercepted real-world cyclists. Air quality and energy expenditure were considered in routing decisions by 51% and 73% of the cyclists, respectively. Model results show that traffic safety and air pollution risks are perceived differently by cyclists, which has implications for modeling urban cycling behaviour in the context of evolving motor vehicle fleets. Safety concerns were associated with less frequent cycling, but not air quality concerns. Consideration of energy expenditure varies significantly among individuals and trip types, which will emerge with different preferences related to hills, stops, speeds, and electric-assistance. Energy and air quality concerns were significantly associated, suggesting health-conscious cyclists who tended to be older, have higher educational attainment, be more physically active, and cycle more recreationally. Utilitarian and recreational cycling trips had different relationships with health-related considerations and with weekly physical activity. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd

Factors

Models

Source variable Target variable Effect p-value Effect type
Individual education: some high school or less Safety concern 0.2 0 standardized_direct_effect
Individual education: completed high school Safety concern 0.01 0.8 standardized_direct_effect
Household vehicles per licensed drivers: <1 Safety concern -0.18 0 standardized_direct_effect
Individual education: some high school or less Energy consciousness -0.15 0.04 standardized_direct_effect
Individual education: completed high school Energy consciousness -0.06 0.25 standardized_direct_effect
Individual education: some high school or less Air quality consciousness -0.21 0 standardized_direct_effect
Individual education: completed high school Air quality consciousness 0.05 0.52 standardized_direct_effect
Individual age: 40-49 years old Air quality consciousness 0.16 0.03 standardized_direct_effect
Individual age: 50 or more years old Air quality consciousness 0.13 0.13 standardized_direct_effect
Intercept trip purpose: commute Bicycling for commute purposes 0.49 0 standardized_direct_effect
Individual age: 40-49 years old Bicycling for commute purposes -0.1 0.02 standardized_direct_effect
Individual age: 50 or more years old Bicycling for commute purposes -0.21 0 standardized_direct_effect
Household vehicles per licensed drivers: <1 Bicycling for commute purposes 0.11 0.01 standardized_direct_effect
Intercept trip purpose: commute Bicycling for shopping purposes -0.05 0.29 standardized_direct_effect
Individual education: some high school or less Bicycling for shopping purposes -0.16 0 standardized_direct_effect
Individual education: completed high school Bicycling for shopping purposes -0.06 0.14 standardized_direct_effect
Household vehicles per licensed drivers: <1 Bicycling for shopping purposes 0.17 0 standardized_direct_effect
Intercept trip purpose: commute Bicycling for recreational purposes -0.21 0 standardized_direct_effect
Individual sex: female Bicycling for recreational purposes -0.22 0 standardized_direct_effect
Energy consciousness Moderate-intensity physical activity 0.36 0 standardized_direct_effect
Energy consciousness Vigorous-intensity physical activity 0.31 0 standardized_direct_effect
Individual age: 40-49 years old Vigorous-intensity physical activity -0.08 0.1 standardized_direct_effect
Individual age: 50 or more years old Vigorous-intensity physical activity -0.11 0.02 standardized_direct_effect
Individual sex: female Vigorous-intensity physical activity -0.11 0.02 standardized_direct_effect
Energy consciousness Safety concern -0.32 0.02 correlation
Air quality consciousness Safety concern 0.11 0.27 correlation
Bicycling for commute purposes Safety concern -0.19 0.01 correlation
Bicycling for shopping purposes Safety concern -0.21 0 correlation
Bicycling for recreational purposes Safety concern -0.15 0.04 correlation
Air quality consciousness Energy consciousness 0.64 0 correlation
Bicycling for commute purposes Energy consciousness 0.07 0.43 correlation
Bicycling for shopping purposes Energy consciousness 0.15 0.09 correlation
Bicycling for recreational purposes Energy consciousness 0.31 0.02 correlation
Bicycling for commute purposes Air quality consciousness 0.18 0.09 correlation
Bicycling for shopping purposes Air quality consciousness 0.26 0 correlation
Bicycling for recreational purposes Air quality consciousness 0.27 0 correlation
Bicycling for shopping purposes Bicycling for commute purposes 0.51 0 correlation
Bicycling for recreational purposes Bicycling for commute purposes 0.12 0.14 correlation
Moderate-intensity physical activity Bicycling for commute purposes 0.1 0.35 correlation
Vigorous-intensity physical activity Bicycling for commute purposes 0.07 0.22 correlation
Bicycling for recreational purposes Bicycling for shopping purposes 0.38 0 correlation
Moderate-intensity physical activity Bicycling for shopping purposes 0.23 0 correlation
Vigorous-intensity physical activity Bicycling for shopping purposes 0.15 0.03 correlation
Moderate-intensity physical activity Bicycling for recreational purposes 0.22 0 correlation
Vigorous-intensity physical activity Bicycling for recreational purposes 0.29 0 correlation
Vigorous-intensity physical activity Moderate-intensity physical activity 0.52 0 correlation

The Attitudes and Travel Database is produced with support from the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks at Arizona State University, a University Transportation Center sponsored by the US Department of Transportation through Grant No. 69A3551747116.

sha256:a08d9e369743bf7e6d1c40d27347318209b40a7fb1543813fdcf31b898918815