Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity for leisure and transportation in Curitiba, Brazil
Diana C. Parra, Christine M. Hoehner, Pedro C. Hallal, Isabela C. Ribeiro, Rodrigo Reis, Ross C. Brownson, Michael Pratt, Eduardo J. Simoes, 2010, in Preventive Medicine 52
doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.12.008
Location |
Curitiba, Brazil |
Population |
General |
Sample size |
2008 |
Factor analysis type |
principal components, unknown rotation |
Stepwise regression |
no |
Removal of insignificant variables |
no |
Reviewed by |
NAH |
Abstract
Background: Physical activity (PA) has consistently been associated with perceived environmental characteristics. Objective: To examine the association between perceived environmental attributes and various forms of PA in Curitiba, Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional phone survey of adults was conducted in 2008 (n = 2097). The questionnaire included environmental perceptions and PA. Principal components analysis was used to identify groups of perceived environmental attributes. Multivariate methods tested the associations of PA with perceived environment characteristics. Results: Perceptions of moderate and high personal safety were positively associated with walking for transportation (53.0%, 53.1% vs. 47.3%, both adjusted ORs [aOR] = 1.5). Number of destinations within a 10-minute walk (4 and > 6 vs < 3) was positively associated with bicycling for transportation (7.8%, 9.9% vs.4.8%, aOR = 2.5). Perception of high accessibility was positively associated with MVPA during leisure time (35.1% vs. 19.1, aOR = 1.7) and meeting recommendations for total PA (58.7% vs. 45.1%, aOR = 1.4). Perception of high quality of the pedestrian space (57.3% vs. 46.5%, aOR = 1.4) and moderate levels of personal safety (54.3% vs. 47.6%, aOR = 1.3) were also positively associated with meeting recommendations for total PA. Conclusions: Different environmental attributes were associated with different PA outcomes, suggesting that these relationships are complex and may differ from those in high-income countries. © 2010 Elsevier Inc.
Factors
Models
Dependent variable |
Walking for transport |
Model type |
nan |
Sample size |
2008 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Odds_ratio |
p-value |
Low Accessibility |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Accessibility |
0.9
|
0.551 |
High Accessibility |
0.9
|
0.505 |
Low Quality of the pedestrian environment |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Quality of the pedestrian environment |
0.9
|
0.505 |
High Quality of the pedestrian environment |
1.0
|
1.0 |
Low Personal Safety |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Personal Safety |
1.5
|
0.004 |
High Personal Safety |
1.5
|
0.032 |
Low Traffic Safety |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Traffic Safety |
1.3
|
0.106 |
HIgh Traffic Safety |
1.3
|
0.169 |
<3 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
CTRL
|
nan |
4 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
1.0
|
1.0 |
5 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
0.8
|
0.207 |
>=6 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
0.9
|
0.593 |
Age |
CTRL
|
nan |
Gender |
CTRL
|
nan |
Education |
CTRL
|
nan |
Car Ownership |
CTRL
|
nan |
Dependent variable |
Biking for transport |
Model type |
nan |
Sample size |
2008 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Odds_ratio |
p-value |
Low Accessibility |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Accessibility |
0.9
|
0.747 |
High Accessibility |
1.3
|
0.404 |
Low Quality of the pedestrian environment |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Quality of the pedestrian environment |
0.9
|
0.707 |
High Quality of the pedestrian environment |
0.8
|
0.426 |
Low Personal Safety |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Personal Safety |
0.9
|
0.707 |
High Personal Safety |
1.1
|
0.781 |
Low Traffic Safety |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Traffic Safety |
1.3
|
0.33 |
HIgh Traffic Safety |
1.2
|
0.678 |
<3 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
CTRL
|
nan |
4 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
2.5
|
0.014 |
5 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
1.8
|
0.103 |
>=6 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
2.5
|
0.014 |
Age |
CTRL
|
nan |
Gender |
CTRL
|
nan |
Education |
CTRL
|
nan |
Car Ownership |
CTRL
|
nan |
Dependent variable |
Walking for leisure |
Model type |
nan |
Sample size |
2008 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Odds_ratio |
p-value |
Low Accessibility |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Accessibility |
1.1
|
0.624 |
High Accessibility |
1.1
|
0.552 |
Low Quality of the pedestrian environment |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Quality of the pedestrian environment |
0.9
|
0.505 |
High Quality of the pedestrian environment |
1.2
|
0.261 |
Low Personal Safety |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Personal Safety |
0.9
|
0.505 |
High Personal Safety |
0.9
|
0.593 |
Low Traffic Safety |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Traffic Safety |
0.9
|
0.551 |
HIgh Traffic Safety |
0.6
|
0.014 |
<3 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
CTRL
|
nan |
4 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
0.9
|
0.626 |
5 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
0.8
|
0.318 |
>=6 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
1.1
|
0.62 |
Age |
CTRL
|
nan |
Gender |
CTRL
|
nan |
Education |
CTRL
|
nan |
Car Ownership |
CTRL
|
nan |
Dependent variable |
Biking for leisure |
Model type |
nan |
Sample size |
2008 |
R2 |
nan |
Adjusted R2 |
|
Pseudo R2
(nan)
|
nan |
AIC |
nan |
BIC |
nan |
Log-likelihood at zero |
nan |
Log-likelihood at constants |
nan |
Log-likelihood at convergence |
nan |
Variable |
Odds_ratio |
p-value |
Low Accessibility |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Accessibility |
1.2
|
0.378 |
High Accessibility |
1.7
|
0.003 |
Low Quality of the pedestrian environment |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Quality of the pedestrian environment |
1.1
|
0.552 |
High Quality of the pedestrian environment |
1.3
|
0.138 |
Low Personal Safety |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Personal Safety |
1.9
|
0.0 |
High Personal Safety |
1.3
|
0.169 |
Low Traffic Safety |
CTRL
|
nan |
Moderate Traffic Safety |
0.9
|
0.505 |
HIgh Traffic Safety |
0.9
|
0.626 |
<3 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
CTRL
|
nan |
4 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
0.9
|
0.626 |
5 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
0.9
|
0.593 |
>=6 Destinations withen 10 min walk |
1.1
|
0.674 |
Age |
CTRL
|
nan |
Gender |
CTRL
|
nan |
Education |
CTRL
|
nan |
Car Ownership |
CTRL
|
nan |