Private and public modes of bicycle commuting: a perspective on attitude and perception

Curto, de Nazelle, Donaire-Gonzalez, Cole-Hunter, Garcia-Aymerich, Martı́nez, Anaya, Rodrı́guez, Jerrett, Nieuwenhuijsen, 2016, in The European Journal of Public Health

doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckv235
Location Barcelona
Population General
Sample size 814
Factor analysis type principal components, Orthogonal rotation
Stepwise regression nan
Removal of insignificant variables yes
Reviewed by NAH

Abstract

Background: Public bicycle-sharing initiatives can act as health enhancement strategies among urban populations. The aim of the study was to determine which attitudes and perceptions of behavioural control toward cycling and a bicycle-sharing system distinguish commuters with a different adherence to bicycle commuting. Methods: The recruitment process was conducted in 40 random points in Barcelona from 2011 to 2012. Subjects completed a telephone-based questionnaire including 27 attitude and perception statements. Based on their most common one-way commute trip and willingness to commute by bicycle, subjects were classified into Private Bicycle (PB), public bicycle or Bicing Bicycle (BB), Willing Non-bicycle (WN) and Non-willing Non-bicycle (NN) commuters. After reducing the survey statements through principal component analysis, a multinomial logistic regression model was obtained to evaluate associations between attitudinal and commuter sub-groups. Results: We included 814 adults in the analysis [51.6% female, mean (SD): age 36.6 (10.3) years]. BB commuters were 2.0 times [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-3.7] less likely to perceive bicycle as a quick, flexible and enjoyable mode compared to PB. BB, WN and NN were 2.5 (95% CI = 1.46-4.24), 2.6 (95% CI = 1.53-4.41) and 2.3 times (95% CI = 1.30-4.10) more likely to perceive benefits of using public bicycles (bicycle maintenance and parking avoidance, low cost and no worries about theft and vandalism) than did PB. Conclusion: Willing non-bicycle and public-bicycle commuters had more favourable perception toward public-shared bicycles compared to private cyclists. Hence, public bicycles may be the impetus for those willing to start bicycle commuting, thereby increasing physical activity levels. © 2016 The Author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Factors

Models

Dependent variable Type of bicycle commuter
Model type multinomial logistic regression model
Sample size 814.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants nan
Log-likelihood at convergence nan
Bikeshare
Variable Adjusted_relative_risk_ratio p-value
Direct cycling benefits and barriers 0.5 0.029
Cycling indirect barriers 1.86 0.015
Public bicycle benefits 2.35 0.001
Non-willing Non-bicycle
Variable Adjusted_relative_risk_ratio p-value
Direct cycling benefits and barriers 0.09 0.0
Cycling indirect barriers 1.02 0.939
Public bicycle benefits 2.15 0.005
Willing Non-bicycle
Variable Adjusted_relative_risk_ratio p-value
Direct cycling benefits and barriers 0.2 0.0
Cycling indirect barriers 1.75 0.021
Public bicycle benefits 2.51 0.0
Variable Adjusted_relative_risk_ratio p-value
Gender CTRL nan
Age CTRL nan
Bicycle commuting experience CTRL nan
access to private bicycle CTRL nan
Bikeshare membership CTRL nan

The Attitudes and Travel Database is produced with support from the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks at Arizona State University, a University Transportation Center sponsored by the US Department of Transportation through Grant No. 69A3551747116.

sha256:a08d9e369743bf7e6d1c40d27347318209b40a7fb1543813fdcf31b898918815