Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods

Kumar, Sekhar, Parida, 2018, in Journal of Transport Geography

doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.09.005
Location New Delhi, India
Population General
Sample size 2633
Factor analysis type exploratory factor analysis, Oblique rotation
Stepwise regression no
Removal of insignificant variables no
Reviewed by AR

Factors

Models

Dependent variable Residential Choice
Model type Binary Logit
Sample size 2633.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (Nagelkerke) 0.234
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants 3068.604
Log-likelihood at convergence nan
Variable Coefficient p-value
Private Mode Preference(PrP) -0.443 0
Public Mode Preference(PuP) 0.069 0.125
Mode Safety Preference(SP) -1.213 0
HH size(Nos.) -0.044 0.342
AGE (Yrs) -0.065 0.14
Travel cost (INR) -0.113 0.103
HH income (INR) 0.462 0
Workers/HH (Nos.) -0.066 0.157
Constant 0.416 0
Dependent variable Mode choice parameter
Model type multinominal logit
Sample size 1544.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (McFadden) 0.413
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero 1647.617
Log-likelihood at constants nan
Log-likelihood at convergence nan
Active Transport
Variable Odds_ratio p-value
Intercept nan nan
Dissonance Factor (TOD: Private Mode Preference(PrP)) 0.668 nan
Employment Density(jobs/km2) 1.515 nan
Entropy(0-1) 1.366 nan
Network Impedence(km/km2) 0.633 nan
Distance to transit(km) 0.937 nan
Vehicle Ownership(Nos.) 0.707 nan
Household Travel Cost(INR) 1.001 nan
Trip Distance (km) 0.607 nan
Trip Time (mins) 0.836 nan
Trip cost(INR) 0.771 nan
Female(ref:male) 9.964 nan
No driving license (ref: yes) 37.385 nan
Public Transport
Variable Odds_ratio p-value
Intercept nan nan
Dissonance Factor (TOD: Private Mode Preference(PrP)) 1.001 nan
Employment Density(jobs/km2) 1.014 nan
Entropy(0-1) 1.222 nan
Network Impedence(km/km2) 0.997 nan
Distance to transit(km) 1.147 nan
Vehicle Ownership(Nos.) 0.658 nan
Household Travel Cost(INR) 0.964 nan
Trip Distance (km) 1.065 nan
Trip Time (mins) 1.19 nan
Trip cost(INR) 0.5 nan
Female(ref:male) 3.656 nan
No driving license (ref: yes) 79.965 nan
Dependent variable Mode Choice parameter
Model type multinominal logit
Sample size 1089.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (McFadded) 0.382
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero 1126.561
Log-likelihood at constants nan
Log-likelihood at convergence nan
Active Transport
Variable Odds_ratio p-value
Intercept nan nan
Consonance Factor (Non-TOD: Private Mode Preference(PrP)) 1.322 nan
Employment Density(jobs/km2) 0.548 nan
Entropy(0-1) 0.464 nan
Network Impedence(km/km2) 0.57 nan
Distance to transit(km) 2.204 nan
Vehicle Ownership(Nos.) 0.845 nan
Household Travel Cost(INR) 1.022 nan
Trip Distance (km) 0.242 nan
Trip Time (mins) 1.641 nan
Trip cost(INR) 0.923 nan
Female(ref:male) 4.185 nan
No driving license (ref: yes) 11.489 nan
Public Transport
Variable Odds_ratio p-value
Intercept nan nan
Consonance Factor (Non-TOD: Private Mode Preference(PrP)) 0.795 nan
Employment Density(jobs/km2) 1.049 nan
Entropy(0-1) 1.416 nan
Network Impedence(km/km2) 1.204 nan
Distance to transit(km) 0.683 nan
Vehicle Ownership(Nos.) 0.816 nan
Household Travel Cost(INR) 0.787 nan
Trip Distance (km) 1.211 nan
Trip Time (mins) 1.054 nan
Trip cost(INR) 0.567 nan
Female(ref:male) 4.438 nan
No driving license (ref: yes) 48.65 nan

The Attitudes and Travel Database is produced with support from the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks at Arizona State University, a University Transportation Center sponsored by the US Department of Transportation through Grant No. 69A3551747116.

sha256:a08d9e369743bf7e6d1c40d27347318209b40a7fb1543813fdcf31b898918815