Understanding car ownership motivations among Indonesian students
Belgiawan, Schmöcker, Fujii, 2016, in International Journal of Sustainable Transportation
doi:10.1080/15568318.2014.921846
Location |
Bandung, Indonesia |
Population |
Students |
Sample size |
500 |
Factor analysis type |
principal components, varimax rotation |
Stepwise regression |
no |
Removal of insignificant variables |
yes |
Reviewed by |
LCM |
Abstract
Car and motorcycle ownership levels are increasing rapidly in southeast Asian developing countries, leading to unsustainable developments. In this article we focus on car ownership motivations in Bandung, Indonesia, where cars have become the main contributor to traffic congestion. We suggest that attitudes toward cars are important for explaining car ownership trends. Using data from 500 undergraduate students from one university in Bandung, this study constructs five factors regarding car perception through principle component analysis: symbolic/affective, arrogant prestige, independence, comfort, and social/env. care. These five factors plus some sociodemographic variables, such as monthly income, are used as explanatory variables for modeling car ownership using structural equation modeling. Our results suggest that primarily independence, arrogant prestige, and some sociodemographic variables significantly influence car purchase decisions. We discuss tentative implications for transport policy, given the limitations of our sample. © 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Factors
Models
Source variable |
Target variable |
Effect |
p-value |
Effect type |
Monthly income |
Commuting distance |
-1.18 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Commuting distance |
Frequency of using PT |
-0.15 |
0.001 |
direct_effect |
Symbolic/affective |
Car ownership |
-0.04 |
0.484 |
direct_effect |
Arrogant prestige |
Car ownership |
-0.33 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Independence |
Car ownership |
0.44 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Comfort |
Car ownership |
0.13 |
0.168 |
direct_effect |
Social/env. Care |
Car ownership |
0.54 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Commuting distance |
Car ownership |
0.02 |
0.038 |
direct_effect |
PT is reliable |
Car ownership |
-0.09 |
0.019 |
direct_effect |
Frequency of using PT |
Car ownership |
-0.05 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Monthly income |
Car ownership |
0.26 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
PT is fast |
Car ownership |
0.02 |
0.562 |
direct_effect |
Source variable |
Target variable |
Effect |
p-value |
Effect type |
Monthly income |
Commuting distance |
-1.2 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Commuting distance |
Frequency of using PT |
-0.15 |
0.001 |
direct_effect |
Monthly income |
Independence |
0.21 |
0.005 |
direct_effect |
Arrogant prestige |
Car ownership |
-0.2 |
0.001 |
direct_effect |
Independence |
Car ownership |
0.3 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Social/env. Care |
Car ownership |
0.14 |
0.338 |
direct_effect |
Commuting distance |
Car ownership |
0.02 |
0.033 |
direct_effect |
PT is reliable |
Car ownership |
-0.09 |
0.019 |
direct_effect |
Frequency of using PT |
Car ownership |
-0.05 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Monthly income |
Car ownership |
0.2 |
0.001 |
direct_effect |
Source variable |
Target variable |
Effect |
p-value |
Effect type |
Monthly income |
Commuting distance |
-1.2 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Commuting distance |
Frequency of using PT |
-0.15 |
0.001 |
direct_effect |
Monthly income |
Independence |
0.21 |
0.005 |
direct_effect |
Arrogant prestige |
Car ownership |
-0.21 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Independence |
Car ownership |
0.33 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Commuting distance |
Car ownership |
0.02 |
0.033 |
direct_effect |
PT is reliable |
Car ownership |
-0.09 |
0.019 |
direct_effect |
Frequency of using PT |
Car ownership |
-0.05 |
0.0 |
direct_effect |
Monthly income |
Car ownership |
0.19 |
0.002 |
direct_effect |
Commuting distance |
Frequency of using PT |
0.01 |
0.007 |
direct_effect |
Monthly income |
Commuting distance |
-0.03 |
0.065 |
direct_effect |
Monthly income |
Frq PT + ComDist |
-0.01 |
0.018 |
direct_effect |
Monthly income |
Independence |
0.07 |
0.01 |
direct_effect |