What Affects Millennials’ Mobility? PART II: The Impact of Residential Location, Individual Preferences and Lifestyles on Young Adults’ Travel Behavior in California

Circella, Alemi, Tiedeman, Berliner, Lee, Fulton, Mokhtarian, Handy, 2017, in National Center for Sustainable Transportation Research Report

doi:nan
Location California, USA
Population Other (specify)
Sample size 2400
Factor analysis type exploratory factor analysis, Oblique rotation
Stepwise regression no
Removal of insignificant variables yes
Reviewed by LCM

Abstract

Young adults (“millennials”, or members of “Generation Y”) are increasingly reported to have different lifestyles and travel behavior from previous generations at the same stage in life. They postpone the time at which they obtain a driver’s license, often choose not to own a car, drive less if they own one, and use alternative non-motorized means of transportation more often. Several explanations have been proposed to explain the behaviors of millennials, including their preference for urban locations closer to the vibrant parts of a city, changes in household composition, and the substitution of travel for work and socializing with telecommuting and social media. However, research in this area has been limited by a lack of comprehensive data on the factors affecting millennials’ residential location and travel choices (e.g. information about individual attitudes, lifestyles and adoption of shared mobility is not available in the U.S. National Household Travel Survey and most regional household travel surveys).View the NCST Project Webpage

Factors

Models

Dependent variable Weekly VMT
Model type Log-linear
Sample size 1801.0
R2 0.48
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants nan
Log-likelihood at convergence nan
Variable Coefficient p-value
Intercept 0.487 0.302
Occupation: student only 0.437 0.004
Occupation: student and worker 0.73 <0.001
Occupation: works only 0.687 <0.001
Sex (male) 0.271 <0.001
Age 0.038 0.163
Age squared -0.001 0.138
Household income > $100k 0.291 <0.001
Household income $35k-$100k 0.155 0.031
Lives with parents -0.235 0.003
Lives with children 0.206 0.001
Car availability (%) 0.027 <0.001
Telecommuting frequency -0.506 0.001
Population density -0.007 <0.001
Diversity -0.557 <0.001
Pro-suburban 0.054 0.064
Responsive to environmental effect and price of travel -0.055 0.047
Established in life 0.107 0.001
Must own car 0.106 <0.001
Time/mode constrained 0.165 <0.001
Dependent variable Weekly VMT
Model type Log-linear
Sample size 976.0
R2 0.448
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants nan
Log-likelihood at convergence nan
Variable Coefficient p-value
Intercept -5.253 <0.001
Occupation: student only 0.818 <0.001
Occupation: student and worker 0.839 <0.001
Occupation: works only 0.742 <0.001
Sex (male) 0.205 0.014
Age 0.453 <0.001
Age squared -0.008 <0.001
Household income > $100k 0.462 <0.001
Household income $35k-$100k 0.194 0.042
Lives with parents -0.176 0.083
Lives with children 0.314 0.001
Car availability (%) 0.026 <0.001
Diversity -0.325 0.072
Established in life 0.091 0.057
Must own car 0.119 0.003
Time/mode constrained 0.153 <0.001
Uber/Lyft frequency -1.407 0.05
Dependent variable Weekly VMT
Model type Log-linear
Sample size 825.0
R2 0.517
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants nan
Log-likelihood at convergence nan
Variable Coefficient p-value
Intercept 1.162 <0.001
Occupation: student only -0.441 0.155
Occupation: student and worker 0.608 0.001
Occupation: works only 0.711 <0.001
Sex (male) 0.305 <0.001
Household income > $100k 0.342 0.004
Household income $35k-$100k 0.21 0.062
Lives with parents -0.383 0.004
Car availability (%) 0.029 <0.001
Telecommuting frequency -0.693 <0.001
Population density -0.013 <0.001
Diversity -0.9 <0.001
Pro-suburban 0.066 0.085
Established in life 0.066 0.122
Must own car 0.073 0.082
Dependent variable Vehicle type
Model type Multinomial logit model
Sample size 529.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero -947.84
Log-likelihood at constants -801.05
Log-likelihood at convergence -708.53
Large cars
Variable Coefficient p-value
Age 0.252 0
Age squared -0.003 0.001
Constant -6.181 0
Luxury
Variable Coefficient p-value
Number of children under 18 years old in the household -0.521 0.014
Established in life 0.5 0.025
Household income 0.22 0.014
Interaction HH income with urban neighborhood type 0.121 0.026
Constant -2.561 0
Luxury SUV
Variable Coefficient p-value
Age 1.176 0
Age squared -0.014 0
Female 0.603 0
Time/mode constrained (reversed) -0.584 0.047
Household income 0.479 0.001
Interaction HH income with urban neighborhood type -0.16 0.078
Constant -29.696 0
SUV
Variable Coefficient p-value
Age 0.222 0
Age squared -0.002 0
Number of children under 18 years old in the household 0.488 0
Constant -5.646 0
Small/compact
Variable Coefficient p-value
Age 0.059 0.013
Age squared -0.001 0.045
Number of children under 18 years old in the household -0.266 0.048
Car as a tool 0.355 0.005
Time/mode constrained (reversed) -0.35 0.007
Established in life -0.242 0.067
Household income 0.109 0.084
Constant -0.911 0

The Attitudes and Travel Database is produced with support from the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks at Arizona State University, a University Transportation Center sponsored by the US Department of Transportation through Grant No. 69A3551747116.

sha256:a08d9e369743bf7e6d1c40d27347318209b40a7fb1543813fdcf31b898918815