What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled

Schwanen, Tim and Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2005, in Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

doi:10.1016/j.trd.2004.11.002
Location North San Francisco Bay Area
Population Other (specify)
Sample size 1358
Factor analysis type principal components, Oblique rotation
Stepwise regression no
Removal of insignificant variables yes
Reviewed by AR

Factors

Models

Dependent variable Log total miles
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1248.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (McKelvey-Zavoina) 0.106
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -1595.1
Log-likelihood at convergence -1510.4
Baseline Model
Variable Coefficient p-value
Neighborhood type Dissonance nan nan
MM5 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident 0.16 0.082
Residential location and vehicle ownership nan nan
NSF resident -0.638 0.0
Constant 5.36 0.0
Dependent variable Log total miles
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1248.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (McKelvey-Zavoina) 0.213
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -1595.1
Log-likelihood at convergence -1401.5
Full Model
Variable Coefficient p-value
Neighborhood type dissonance nan nan
MM5 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident 0.154 0.084
Residential location and vehicle ownership nan nan
NSF resident -0.645 0.0
Ratio of vehicles to valid driver's licenses 0.129 0.007
Sociodemographic variables nan nan
Household income (1000 US$) 0.005 0.0
Part-time employed -0.138 0.025
Occupation in sales 0.219 0.004
Female -0.285 0.0
Single working female 0.294 0.0
One-worker family 0.276 0.005
Age (in years) -0.006 0.001
Lifestyle and personalitys nan nan
Adventure seeking 0.095 0.0
Workaholic 0.068 0.017
Travel attitudes nan nan
Travel stress -0.063 0.031
Pro-environmental policy -0.065 0.027
Liking for travel on a bus 0.06 0.013
Constant 5.103 0.0
Dependent variable Log miles by private vehicle
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1247.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (McKelvey-Zavoina) 0.221
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -2251.4
Log-likelihood at convergence -2134.6
Baseline Model
Variable Coefficient p-value
Neighborhood type Dissonance nan nan
MM1 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident 0.364 0.0
Residential location and vehicle ownership nan nan
NSF resident -1.495 0.0
Constant 5.108 0.0
Dependent variable Log miles by private vehicle
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1247.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (McKelvey-Zavoina) 0.391
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -2251.4
Log-likelihood at convergence -1981.7
Full Model
Variable Coefficient p-value
Residential location and vehicle ownership nan nan
NSF resident -0.769 0.0
Ratio of vehicles to valid driver's licenses 0.68 0.0
Mobility constraints nan nan
Driving at night -0.439 0.003
Using public transit 0.32 0.045
Sociodemographic variables nan nan
Household income (1000 US$) 0.008 0.0
Part-time employed -0.193 0.048
Occupation in sales 0.367 0.002
Female -0.177 0.02
Single working female 0.283 0.029
One-worker family 0.498 0.001
Lifestyle and personalitys nan nan
Adventure seeking 0.098 0.017
Travel attitudes nan nan
Travel freedom 0.231 0.0
Pro-environmental policy -0.235 0.0
Constant 3.562 0.0
Variable Coefficient p-value
Multiple adults and workers -2.68 0.077
Number of persons with valid driver's license 0.137 0.008
Dependent variable Weekly distance traveled by rail
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1353.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -1316.8
Log-likelihood at convergence 1157.8
Regression(distance)
Variable Coefficient p-value
MM5 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident 0.871 0.05
NSF resident -2.037 0.0
Constant 5.857 0.0
Selection(use)
Variable Coefficient p-value
MM2 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident -0.567 0.0
MM4 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice, interacted with neighborhood attachment) for PH resident 1.3 0.002
MM4 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice, interacted with neighborhood attachment) for CON resident 0.189 0.0
NSF resident 0.795 0.0
Constant 1.088 0.0
Variable Coefficient p-value
Neighborhood type dissonance nan nan
Residential location and vehicle ownership nan nan
Dependent variable Weekly distance traveled by rail
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1353.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -1316.8
Log-likelihood at convergence -1009.3
Regression(distance)
Variable Coefficient p-value
MM5 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for suburban resident -1.234 0.0
NSF resident -2.041 0.0
Professional/technical occupation 0.296 0.071
Status seeking -0.232 0.04
Frustrated 0.201 0.042
Constant 4.77 0.0
Selection(use)
Variable Coefficient p-value
MM2 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident -0.343 0.0
Ratio of vehicles to valid driver's licenses -0.405 0.0
Bicycling 0.233 0.018
Occupation in services -0.575 0.002
Occupation in production/construction/crafts -0.578 0.011
One-worker family -0.731 0.0
Female in multiple-worker family -0.295 0.007
Pro-environmental policy 0.33 0.0
Liking for traveling by rail 0.186 0.0
Constant -1.083 0.0
Variable Coefficient p-value
Neighborhood type dissonance nan nan
Residential location and vehicle ownership nan nan
Mobility constraints nan nan
Sociodemographics nan nan
Personality and lifestyles nan nan
Travel attitudes nan nan
Dependent variable Distance traveled by bus
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1325.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -1461.9
Log-likelihood at convergence -1080.2
Regression(distance)
Variable Coefficient p-value
PH resident -0.928 0.005
Constant 2.894 0.0
Selection(use)
Variable Coefficient p-value
MM2 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident -0.558 0.0
MM5 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for PH resident 0.621 0.001
NSF resident 2.256 0.0
Constant -1.764 0.0
Variable Coefficient p-value
Neighborhood type dissonance nan nan
Residential location and vehicle ownership nan nan
Dependent variable Distance traveled by bus
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1325.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -1461.9
Log-likelihood at convergence -882.9
Regression(distance)
Variable Coefficient p-value
MM2 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident 0.2 0.04
PH resident -0.805 0.013
Two-worker couple -0.301 0.011
One-worker family -3.566 0.013
Female in one-worker family 2.488 0.0
Status seeking 0.2 0.003
Workaholic -0.185 0.016
Constant 3.128 0.0
Selection(use)
Variable Coefficient p-value
MM2 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident -0.558 0.0
MM5 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for PH resident 0.452 0.039
NSF resident 1.667 0.0
Ratio of vehicles to valid driver's licenses -0.783 0.0
Driving on a freeway 0.896 0.011
Using public transit -0.59 0.029
Household income (1000 US$) -0.009 0.0
Occupation in sales -0.287 0.049
Occupation in production/construction/crafts -0.708 0.002
Two-worker couple 0.31 0.002
Age (in years) -0.015 0.0
Travel freedom -0.249 0.0
Pro-environmental policy 0.187 0.003
Liking for traveling by bus 0.231 0.0
Constant -0.542 0.28
Variable Coefficient p-value
Neighborhood type dissonance nan nan
Residential location and vehicle ownership nan nan
Mobility constraints nan nan
Sociodemographics nan nan
Personality and lifestyles nan nan
Travel attitudes nan nan
Dependent variable Distance traveled by walking/jogging/bicycling
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1303.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -2085.4
Log-likelihood at convergence -1819.3
Regression(distance)
Variable Coefficient p-value
MM2 (Pro-high density consistent with RL choice) for NSF resident -0.149 0.008
NSF resident 0.441 0.0
CON resident -0.261 0.002
Constant 1.905 0.0
Selection(use)
Variable Coefficient p-value
NSF resident 0.536 0.0
CON resident -0.279 0.036
Constant 0.838 0.0
Variable Coefficient p-value
Neighborhood type dissonance nan nan
Residential location nan nan
Dependent variable Distance traveled by walking/jogging/bicycling
Model type Tobit regression
Sample size 1303.0
R2 nan
Adjusted R2
Pseudo R2 (nan) nan
AIC nan
BIC nan
Log-likelihood at zero nan
Log-likelihood at constants -2085.4
Log-likelihood at convergence -1650.1
Regression(distance)
Variable Coefficient p-value
Professional/technical occupation 0.2 0.033
Household income (1000 US$) -0.002 0.005
Female in multiple-worker family -0.323 0.0
Adventure seeking 0.102 0.0
Frustrated -0.06 0.034
Pro-environmental policy 0.082 0.005
Liking for traveling by personal vehicle -0.049 0.055
Liking for walking/cycling/jogging 0.348 0.0
Liking for traveling to eat out -0.074 0.03
Constant 1.304 0.0
Selection(use)
Variable Coefficient p-value
NSF resident 0.468 0.0
'Other' household -0.385 0.055
Liking for traveling by bus -0.123 0.058
Liking for walking/cycling/jogging 0.664 0.0
Constant -1.213 0.0
Variable Coefficient p-value
Residential location nan nan
Sociodemographics nan nan
Personality and lifestyles nan nan
Travel attitudes nan nan

The Attitudes and Travel Database is produced with support from the Center for Teaching Old Models New Tricks at Arizona State University, a University Transportation Center sponsored by the US Department of Transportation through Grant No. 69A3551747116.

sha256:a08d9e369743bf7e6d1c40d27347318209b40a7fb1543813fdcf31b898918815